As a student journalist, I have observed a noticeable absence of Asian students at pro-Palestinian demonstrations on the UC Berkeley campus. This raises important questions about the role of race in activism and how young people choose to support political causes, such as opposing Israel’s military actions in Gaza.
In recent conversations with my peers, I have found that many Asian students, like myself, prefer physical demonstrations as a way to show involvement in activism. These events, such as sit-ins and marches, provide a tangible way to voice dissent and demand change. The historical significance of such protests underscores their impact, even before mainstream media attention.
However, participating in physical protests comes with challenges. Safety concerns, especially in light of recent events involving police arrests at peaceful protests, are a significant deterrent for many students. Additionally, balancing academic responsibilities with activism can be difficult, particularly for Asian students who face family pressure to excel academically.
On the other hand, digital activism offers a more accessible and convenient alternative. Platforms like Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook allow students to engage with issues, share information, and mobilize support without the need to be physically present. Online campaigns, such as those addressing anti-Asian hate crimes, demonstrate the power of digital platforms to drive meaningful change.
While digital activism is effective, physical demonstrations create a sense of urgency and draw immediate media attention. They also provide a sense of community and collective action that can be empowering for participants. Finding a balance between traditional protests and online activism will be crucial for future advocacy efforts.
Historically, Asian students have been perceived as less engaged in visible forms of protest due to cultural values, academic pressures, and limited awareness of current events. However, this does not mean that Asian students lack political engagement. Many are active in digital spaces, where they can voice their opinions, share information, and organize without the risks associated with physical protests.
In conclusion, the choice between physical and digital activism is a personal one for each student. Both forms of activism have their advantages and challenges, and finding a balance between the two will be key to effectively advocating for social justice. As I pursue a career in journalism, these experiences and reflections will shape how I engage with and report on activism in the future.
